Legal Opinion

Dessart v. Burak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2004No. Docket 122238PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion. Plaintiff argued that he was entitled to mediation sanctions under MCR 2.403 in his third-party negligence action. His claim for sanctions under MCR 2.403 requires a determination whether “assessable costs” include attorney fees and whether assessable costs are calculated from the filing of the complaint to the rendering of the verdict. The Court of Appeals answered both questions in the negative. We affirm.

i. procedural background

Plaintiff William Dessart and defendant Lynn Burak were involved in an automobile collision. Plaintiff and his wife filed a third-party…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Nemeth v. Abonmarche Development, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Beach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Grow v. W a Thomas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re Temple Marital TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Heaton v. Benton Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API