Legal Opinion

CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2002No. Docket 116751PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

We granted leave to consider whether a party may appeal an adverse summary disposition judgment on one count of a multicount action after accepting a case evaluation rendered under MCR 2.403. The plain language of MCR 2.403(M)(1) provides that a party’s acceptance of a case evaluation disposes of “all claims in the action.” We conclude, therefore, that, upon acceptance of a case evaluation under MCR 2.403, a party may not subsequently appeal an adverse summary disposition on one count in the action.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In August 1998, plaintiff CAM Construction filed a four-count complaint…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Grievance Administrator v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Perez v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Marketos v. American Employers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McDonald v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API