Legal Opinion

Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2005No. Docket 125022PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

At issue in this case is whether appellate attorney fees and costs are recoverable as case evaluation sanctions under MCR 2.403(0). We hold that “actual costs” pursuant to MCR 2.403(0) do not include appellate attorney fees and costs. Because the Court of Appeals held to the contrary, we reverse its decision, reinstate the trial court’s award, and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of plaintiffs’ cross-appeal.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Valeria Haliw was walking on a snow-covered sidewalk when she slipped and fell on a patch of ice that formed in a depressed area…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Grievance Administrator v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Marketos v. American Employers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pirgu v. United Services Automobile AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API