Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2006No. Docket 127018PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C.J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether the minority/insanity tolling provision of the Revised Judicature Act (RJA), MCL 600.5851(1), applies to toll the “one-year-back rule” in MCL 500.3145(1) of the no-fault automobile insurance act.1 The Court of Appeals, reversing the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for summary disposition, held that it does not, but further concluded that the tolling provision at issue does not apply to the applicable statute of limitations for no-fault actions that is also set out in MCL 500.3145(1).

We affirm the Court of Appeals determination that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API