Legal Opinion

Brown v. Gaskins

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1984No. 0337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In this action for an injunction against and damages for trespass, the issue raised is whether respondent Kenneth Brown, owner of a servient estate, may place a gate across an easement and require appellant Russell Gaskins, owner of the dominant estate, to open and close the gate as a condition of passage. The master in equity to whom the case was referred with finality held that the servient estate could burden the dominant estate with the gate. We agree and affirm.

Russell Gaskins owns property adjacent to the Edisto River to which he gains access by way of a road which runs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Gilstrap v. CulpepperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Watson v. HokeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Trustees of the Columbia Academy v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Tanaka v. SheehanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Ballington v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Faulkenberry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Davis v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API