Legal Opinion

Ballington v. Paxton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 9, 1997No. 2674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Chief Judge:

The Appellants appeal from the master-in-equity’s refusal to require David Wayne Paxton to remove a gate and fence constructed on an easement over Paxton’s property. We affirm.

I

This case involves a family dispute over access to Paxton Pond, an approximately 40-acre man-made pond in Lexington County. The pond and adjacent property are located on Highway 34, commonly referred to as Pond Branch Road. A dirt road, Paxton’s Pond Road, goes from Highway 34 and follows along a portion of the pond’s perimeter.

The Appellants, Paxton, and other family members derived title to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Sandy Island Corp. v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. Bivens v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Windham v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Proctor v. SteedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Judy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Price v. McNeilCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API