Legal Opinion

Tanaka v. Sheehan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1991No. 90-644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

This appeal arises out of a dispute between residential property owners with respect to a fifteen foot ingress and egress easement that runs over part of appellants’ property for appellees’ benefit. Appellants sought to put a gate across the width of the easement at its western end and a fence (with gates) along the length of the easement adjacent to appellees’ property. Appellees obtained a temporary restraining order, and thereafter a permanent injunction, to prevent appellants from constructing any gate or fence. We reverse and remand.

I

Appellants Tanakas are the owners…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Missionary Society of the Salesian Congregation v. EvrotasNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Jordan v. GuinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Community Credit Union Services, Inc. v. Federal Express Services Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Flaherty v. FlemingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carrollsburg v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Williams v. FagnaniAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Tidwell v. BeznerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Van Raden v. HarperWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API