Legal Opinion

Vierra v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2007No. C054091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

Petitioner Fred Vierra seeks relief from an order denying reconsideration of a decision by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), upholding an administrative law judge’s finding that a written attorney fee agreement Vierra entered into with his attorney was not binding. Vierra contends that the WCAB’s decision is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and interfered with his right to contract with his attorney. We granted a writ of review and shall now affirm the WCAB order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 21, 2001, Vierra suffered a lower back…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Board of Education of the Round Valley Unified School District v. Round Valley Teachers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Graczyk v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Berlanga v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API