Legal Opinion
Lowden v. Hooper
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 1941No. 29871PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
Frank O. Lowden et al., trustees of the estate of the Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Company, a corporation, appeal from a judgment of the district court of Custer county denying them the recovery of certain taxes paid under protest.
In 1912, acting under authority of a law in existence in territorial days, and brought forward as section 817, C. L. 1909; 500, R. L. 1910; 4463, C. O. S. 1921; 6130, O. S. 1931, and 11 Okla. Stat. Ann. § 481, in slightly amended form, the city of Clinton annexed a part of section 11, township 12 N., range 17 W., lying north of the city, by ordinance No. 60. In this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barton v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of Blackwell v. City of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Peerless Realty & Operating Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Gorby v. GaymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Finucane v. Village of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Gottsch v. IrelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. MaltsbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Swan v. Sargent IndustriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.