Legal Opinion

Finucane v. Village of Hayden

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1963No. 9304PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This action was commenced September 13, 1962, by appellant (plaintiff) directed against the Village of Hayden, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Village, and its Trustees, seeking to have adjudicated as void ordinances of the Village which annexed certain of appellant’s land to the Village, the litigation being ultimately directed at the two ordinances of the Village, dated October 1, 1959 and March 1, 1962, and for relief of disannexation. The facts were uncontroverted and in large part stipulated.

Respondents advanced the affirmative defense that appellant was estopped…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. West v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hatch v. Consumers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Huppert v. WolfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Henderson v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API