Legal Opinion
State v. Robinette
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1997No. 94-1143PublishedCited by 417 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
The first issue that we must determine is whether this court’s prior holding should be reaffirmed under the adequate and independent ground of the Constitution of the state of Ohio.
When the United States Supreme Court incorporated the federal Bill of Rights into the Fourteenth Amendment, the United States Constitution became the primary mechanism to safeguard an individual’s rights. See Principled Interpretations of State Constitutional Law: Why Don’t the “Primacy” States Practice What They Preach? (1993), 54 U.Pitt.L.Rev. 1019, 1023-1024. As a result, state *238court litigation of constitutional…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by417 opinions
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
412 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.