Legal Opinion
Logsdon v. Hains
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 6, 2007No. 06-4085PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Joseph Michael Logsdon, appeals the district court’s order granting a Rule 12(b)(6) motion brought by Defendants, Charles Hains and Daniel McShane, and dismissing Plaintiffs § 1983 suit and related claims. Plaintiff alleged violations of his rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and asserted various state law claims for violations of the Ohio Constitution and state common law. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court’s order and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKG…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Miller v. Sanilac CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Richard Wesley v. Alison CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- John Doe v. David BaumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Brooks v. RotheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- McBride v. GriceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.