Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McCullough v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 29, 2006No. 06-483 CPublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2 OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Pro se plaintiff George Calvin McCullough has made an application to proceed in forma pauperis against the United States, federal agencies, and the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the United States government for various constitutional, criminal, and tort claims allegedly committed in connection with an alleged surgical procedure.1 Plaintiff alleges that defendant and defendant’s agents implanted a transmitting device into plaintiffs brain, widely broadcast plaintiffs private thoughts, and “re-relay[ed] to [plaintiff his] every thought.” Complaint…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. McCullough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Hampel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API