Legal Opinion

Bank of Italy v. Wetzel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1927No. Docket No. 5370PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyleb, P. J.

— Action on a promissory note given for the sum of $5,600. The case was tried without a jury. The findings in effect determined that the defenses interposed were true and judgment followed in favor of defendants.

At the opening of the trial plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was denied. Appellant here claims, first, that the lower court erred in its denial of the motion for the reason that all the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint were admitted and the affirmative defenses relied upon in the answer were legally insufficient to base any judgment in favor of defendants.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Rivera v. CappaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Garfield v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Pierce v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Rusk v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API