Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1953No. Civ. 15474PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant Bertie Parkhurst appeals from a judgment against him in the sum of $5,185.50 on a surety bond.
Questions Presented
1. Was the bond given without consideration ?
2. Was it procured by fraud?
3. Effect of alleged failure to comply with contract provisions.
4. Was the bond void for uncertainty ?
5. Did the court fail to find on material issues ?
Evidence
In May, 1949, plaintiffs were getting bids for the construction of a home and were introduced to Wright, a contractor. June 2d, plaintiffs applied to the San Francisco Federal Savings and Loan Association † for a construction loan. Their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Stewart v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bloss v. RahillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Local 659, I.A.T.S.E. v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Glickman v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kraemer v. Superior Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.