Legal Opinion

McGillivray v. Columbia Salmon Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1919No. 14890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, French, J., entered February 16, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The facts in this case, found by the trial court and supported by competent evidence, may be briefly stated: One Loveland, doing business under the name and style of the Loveland Boat Works, at Bremerton, entered into a written contract to build certain boats and some tenders for the Columbia Salmon Company, a corporation, and the Alaska Pacific Herring Company. The Loveland company proceeded with the construction of the boats for both companies until the Port Blakely Mill Company, on account of the financial straits of the Loveland company, became anxious about payment for the lumber it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malfa v. CrispWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. A. E. Sutton & Co. v. Coast Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Merrill v. Caro Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Siever v. Klots Throwing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hammond v. WaddinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Laliberte v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Peterson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API