Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Laliberte v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 1981No. 4287-1-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Roe, A.C.J.

— Plaintiff Jean Pierre Laliberte, d/b/a Columbia Pool Construction, appeals from a decision of the trial court dismissing his action because he had failed to file a certificate of assumed business name.

Laliberte is a contractor specializing in the installation of swimming pools. He operates his business under the names "Columbia Pool Construction, Jean Pierre Laliberte, Owner", and "Jean Pierre Laliberte, doing business as Columbia Pool Construction”. Defendants Wilkinses hired Laliberte to install a pool and construct a concrete deck around it. Laliberte filed a labor lien…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Malfa v. CrispWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Merrill v. Caro Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Reese Sales Co. v. GierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. McGillivray v. Columbia Salmon Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. McCombs Construction, Inc. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Brad Associates v. Nevada Federal Financial Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Schutze v. SpringmeyerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API