Hammond v. Waddingham
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondent is the payee in, and the owner of, three certain promissory notes, made by one W. J. Waddingham, since deceased, of whose estate the appellant is the administratrix. On the 19th day of October, 1921, a claim against the estate, based upon these notes, was served upon the administratrix and a copy filed with the clerk of the court in the probate proceedings. The claim was verified by the attorney for the respondent, no reason being stated in the verification why it was not or could not have been verified *235by tbe claimant; though it afterwards appeared by the testimony in the case…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Dillabough v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Malfa v. CrispWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- McGillivray v. Columbia Salmon Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Singmaster v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- McKinney v. Estate of McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Gilkes v. BeezerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.