Peterson v. Morris
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered June 30, 1920, upon overruling demurrers to the answer, dismissing an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.
— The plaintiffs, Peterson and Malim, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of a money judgment against the defendants, Morris and wife, in the sum of $772. Their claim for recovery, set forth in two causes of action, grew out of a contract entered into by them in their firm name of “Moon Motor Sales Company” with the defendant Morris on September 28, 1915, in which contract they agreed to purchase a certain number of Moon automobiles from Morris and he agreed to- give them the exclusive right of sale and distribution of Moon automobiles within Pierce…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rothchild Bros. v. MahoneyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- North Star Trading Co. v. Alaska-Yukon-Pacific ExpositionWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hale v. City Cab, Carriage & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Malfa v. CrispWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Thompson-Spencer Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gregory v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Admiral Corp. v. Television Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Renfroe v. TaggaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Admiral Corp. v. Television Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Slater v. StoffelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.