Legal Opinion

People v. Senn

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1992No. 91SA279PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee recommended that the respondent in this attorney discipline proceeding receive a public censure for conduct which violated the criminal laws of Colorado and that adversely reflected on the respondent’s fitness to practice law. We accept the recommendation of the hearing panel, publicly censure the respondent, and order that he be assessed the costs of the disciplinary proceedings.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on May 10, 1974, is registered as an attorney upon this court’s official records, and is subject to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. RostadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. People v. FahseltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. ManzoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Colorado Supreme Court Grievance Committee v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Robert KeeleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API