Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Robert Keele

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 25, 2011No. 10–0832PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against the respondent, James R. Keele, alleging violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. A division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found the respondent’s conduct violated three provisions of the rules and recommended we suspend his license to practice law with no possibility of reinstatement for a period of nine months. On our de novo review, we find the board has failed to establish by a convincing preponderance of the evidence that the respondent has committed a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SteffesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MulfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Peter Sean CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald Lee WheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API