Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country Club

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1930No. 22149. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action instituted by Ernest L. Strickland, as plaintiff, against the Rainier Golf & Country Club and others, as defendants, to recover in damages for personal injuries. The action was tried by the court below sitting with a jury, in which action a verdict was returned against the Rainier Golf & Country Club alone, the action having been dismissed as against the other defendants during the course of the trial. After the return of the verdict, the country club moved for a judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial. These motions were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. O'Neile v. TernesWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Holm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In RE DILLENBURG v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Glass v. Windsor Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Dux v. HostetterWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lasell v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Billias v. PanageotouWashington Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API