Legal Opinion

Billias v. Panageotou

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1938No. 26832. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

These actions were consolidated for trial and are now considered together on this appeal.

In the case of Mike Billias v. Christ Panageotou and Tom Panageotou, the plaintiff alleges that he and the defendants have been for a long time copartners in the ownership, maintenance, and operation of a réstaurant known as the City Grill, in the city of Seattle; that defendants are brothers and have conspired to defraud the plaintiff of his interest in the copartnership; and that they have wilfully failed and refused to allow him to participate in the management of the concern. The plaintiff then asked…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Parker v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Boyd v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Norland v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Northern State Construction Co. v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cummings v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API