Legal Opinion
Norkunas v. HPT Cambridge, LLC
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-12183-WGYPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
William Norkunas (“Norkunas”), a disabled individual as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, brought this suit after he visited the Royal Sonesta Hotel Boston (the “Royal Sonesta”) against HPT Cambridge, LLC and Cambridge TRS, Inc., respectively the owner and lessee of the Royal Sonesta. Norkunas alleges that he encountered several architectural barriers during his visit, which denied him access to full and equal enjoyment of the accommodations in violation of the ADA.
In adjudicating…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Marradi v. K&W Realty Investment LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- In re Outsidewall Tire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- In re Volkswagen & Audi Warranty Extension LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- De León v. Vornado Montehiedra Acquisition L.P.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- Marshall v. Rio Grande River Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.