Legal Opinion

Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1976No. 75-2141PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

In this clash between two giants of the chrysanthemum business, we confront a myriad of antitrust and plant patent issues. Yoder Brothers (Yoder), plaintiff in the district court, sued, alleging infringement of twenty-one chrysanthemum plant patents by California-Florida Plant Corp. (CFPC) and California-Florida Plant Corp. of Florida (CFPCF) (sometimes referred to collectively as Cal-Florida). CFPC and CFPCF denied the infringement and filed antitrust counterclaims under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. As to seven of the chrysanthemum plant patents, the lower…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. In Re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation. Munitrad Systems, Inc. v. Standard and Poor's CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. P. David Bailey v. Allgas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API