Legal Opinion
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 28, 2003No. A03-250PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant Jeff Wiegand sued respondent Walser Automotive Group (Walser), asserting that Walser’s misrepresentations violated Minn.Stat. § 325F.69, subd. 1 (2002), and that he was entitled to damages for this violation pursuant to Minn. *451Stat. § 8.81, subd. 3a (2002). In this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of Wiegand’s claim for failure to state a claim under Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e), Wiegand argues that the district court erred when it dismissed his claim by ruling that Wiegand could not show reliance on respondents’ alleged misrepresentations. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003