Legal Opinion

Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 2004No. A03-250PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Appellant Jeff Wiegand brought this private consumer fraud class action against respondent Walser Automotive Group, Inc. under Minn.Stat. § 8.31, subd. 3a (2002), and Minn.Stat. § 325F.69, subd. 1 (2002). Wiegand seeks damages on behalf of a class of consumers who purchased service contracts and/or credit insurance from Walser. The issue before us is whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief. The district court dis missed the suit on a Rule 12 motion. The court concluded, as a matter of law, that causation could not be proven on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Grovatt v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Charles P. Nelson v. American Family Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API