Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.. Appellant challenges summary judgment dismissing his claims for intentional damages and limiting him to damages and attorney fees for an unintentional violation of Minnesota Motor Vehicle Retail Installment 'Sales Act (MMVRISA) under Minn. Stat. § 168.71 (2002). Because appellant vehicle purchaser does not claim that respondent auto dealer’s deliberate failure to timely provide a copy of the sales agreement signed by the auto dealership caused or could cause any actual damages or harm, because the substantial statutory damages for intentional violations of MMVRISA are to…