Legal Opinion

Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 2002No. C3-01-1013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Raymond Scott challenges the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent Forest Lake Chrysler Plymouth Dodge (FLC). Scott contends that (1) the six-year statute of limitations applies to his claims; (2) FLC cannot claim a “statutory-cure defense” to the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 168.71(a)(1) (1996); (3) a de minimis exception to the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 168.71(a)(1) does not exist; and (4) the district court’s finding that FLC unintentionally violated Minn.Stat. § 168.71(a)(1) was clearly erroneous. We affirm…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-DodgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API