Legal Opinion

Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group—Phase I

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1988No. C-6618PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether there is an implied warranty by a commercial landlord that the leased premises are suitable for their intended commercial purpose. Respondent Inwood North Professional Group — Phase I sued petitioner Dr. Joseph Davidow for unpaid rent on medical office space leased by Dr. Davi-dow. The jury found that Inwood materially breached the lease agreement and that the defects rendered the office space unsuitable for use as a medical office. The trial court rendered judgment that Inwood take nothing and that Dr. Davidow recover damages for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kamarath v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Golden v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Teodori v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  3. 7979 Airport Garage, L.L.C. v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Gym-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API