Legal Opinion

Teodori v. Werner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980No. 74PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Tenant William Werner (appellant) seeks to open both a confessed money judgment and a confessed judgment of possession entered in favor of landlords Carlo and Mildred Teodori (appellees). Primarily at issue on this appeal is whether landlords’ breach of the lease’s “non-competition” clause provides tenant a defense to the landlord’s actions for sums due and in ejectment. We are persuaded by our established caselaw, e. g., McDanel v. Mack Realty Co., 315 Pa. 174, 172 A. 97 (1934), and modern authority, e. g., Restatement (Second) of Property, Landlord and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Reitmeyer v. SprecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Harris Calorific Co. v. MarraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Harr, SEC. of Bk. v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group—Phase ITexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. TM Carlton House Partners v. Career Planners, Inc. (In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Wesson v. Leone Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API