Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Gilbert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding to settle the scope of an easement over plaintiffs’ property. The trial court held that defendants have an easement over plaintiffs’ property “for the purpose of ingress and egress for the construction and maintenance of necessary utilities and pipelines”; that defendants had enlarged the use of the easement by driving farm vehicles and equipment across it; and restrained and enjoined defendants “from the use of said easement except for the purpose of installation of pipelines and utilities.” Defendants appeal.

There is attached to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Palmateer v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. O'GORMAN v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. James B. House Living Trust Ex Rel. House v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Olson v. Van HornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. First National Bank v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API