Legal Opinion

Tipperman v. Tsiatsos

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1998No. CC 93-12-35919; CA A86086; SC S43269PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction against defendant Tsiatsos (defendant), 1 plaintiff asks this court to modify the trial court’s judgment, which construed a deed that reserved an easement favorably for defendant. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, with one minor modification. Tipperman v. Tsiatsos, 140 Or App 282, 915 P2d 446 (1996). The issues before us concern the proper methodology for construing a deed that reserves an easement and the application of that methodology to the deed at issue in this case. For the reasons that follow, we affirm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Minto v. Salem Water, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Beck v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Verzeano v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Connall v. FeltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API