Legal Opinion

Olson v. Van Horn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 19, 2002No. 99CV0453; A111308; 99CV0461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In these actions for injunctive relief and declaratory judgment, the trial court ruled that the placement of defendant’s home violated the terms of an easement. Consequently, the trial court ordered defendant’s home to be removed from the easement. Defendant appeals and argues that the unambiguous terms of the easement allow plaintiffs access to defendant’s property to maintain the height of vegetation but do not prohibit the building of a home within the easement. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and reverse.

In 1988, Oscar and Estrid Furnes (the Furneses) purchased a 15-acre parcel of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of Van HornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Lute v. Cascadia Tower Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Hunnell v. Roseburg Resources Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Stone v. CCXL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. In re the Marriage of Van HornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API