United States National Bank v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
Tbe deed does not purport to convey an after-acquired interest. It contains no covenants, guarantees, recitals or warranties either as to tbe interest owned by defendant or so as to protect tbe grantee therein in its future enjoyment. At tbe time tbe deed was made defendant bad an interest in tbe real property described. His interest was a leasehold interest but was nevertheless an interest in real property. A lease is defined by Professor Devlin as:
“ * * A conveyance of lands and tenants by a person for life or years, * * Devlin on Real Estate (3 ed.), 23, §13.
Defendant therefore bad an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hunt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Taggart v. RisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1872
- Palmateer v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Dutton v. BuckleyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clark, Admr. v. GaunttTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Equitable Royalty Corp. v. HulletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- McConnell v. CorgeyTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Oregon-Pacific Forest Products Corp. v. Welsh Panel Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.