Legal Opinion
Lo Presti v. Manning
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 1932No. Docket No. 8328PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.
The action is one to recover proceeds of life insurance policies in the sum of $5,000.
The second amended complaint sets forth two causes of action. In the first it is alleged that the plaintiff was the father of Marion Thomas Lo Prestí, who died on May 22, 1930, leaving a widow, the defendant Margaret M. Lo Prestí; that the defendant, Catherine C. Manning, is the mother of said Margaret M. Lo Prestí; that on the twenty-sixth day of May, 1930, said defendants received the sum of $5,000 from the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, for the use and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Hoeft v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mutual Life Insurance of New York v. FranckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Claunch v. WhyteIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Colby's v. PoorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Mahony v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.