Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Bank of Italy

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1923No. Civ. No. 4246PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

This action is one to determine conflicting claims to the benefits of a life insurance policy. The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows:

On the eleventh day of July, 1905, the plaintiff, New York Life Insurance Company, issued a twenty-year tontine endowment policy on the life of one Charles J. Newman. By its terms the policy was made payable to the estate of the insured, but it expressly provided that the beneficiary named therein might be changed upon application to the company. Accordingly, in the year 1907, this privilege was exercised by Newman, and Hattie Vogel, his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. McAllisterTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Succession of Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Succession of BuddigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  4. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. In re the Estate of MosemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Tyre v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API