United States v. Richey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS or Government) challenges the district court’s ruling denying its motion to enforce a summons against Defendant-Appellant, Mark Richey, seeking production of an appraisal work file. The IRS contends that the district court erred when it found that the summons was not issued in good faith, and that the appraisal work file was protected by the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine.
We hold that the IRS summons was issued in good faith, and that the district court erred in finding that Richey’s entire appraisal work…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Rogers v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- In Re Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.