Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanmina Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2020No. 18-17036PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-17036 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-00092- WHA SANMINA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, Respondent-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 11, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed August 7, 2020 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Susan R. Bolton,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Callahan * The Honorable Susan R.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Frankie Greer v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. United States v. Marietta TerabelianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. (PC) O'Brien v. GarzaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. 4WEB, INC, and 4WEB, LLC v. NUVASIVE, INC.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Bruker Cellular Analysis, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API