Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 13, 2001No. 09-00-335 CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

The grand jury issued a two count indictment accusing Shellie Dawn Newman of intoxication manslaughter and manslaughter. The jury found Shellie Dawn Newman to be guilty of manslaughter, found that she used a deadly weapon in the course and commission of the offense, found her to be a repeat felony offender, 1 and assessed her punishment at twenty years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and a $10,000 fine. Newman raises three issues in her appeal.

Issue one asks “[wjhether a fatal variance existed between the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Alejandro Rodriguez Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  4. Alejandro Rodriguez Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Allen Alvin Lee, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API