Hutch v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of possession of cocaine and the trial judge assessed punishment at forty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Hutch v. State, 881 S.W.2d 92 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1994). We granted review to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly applied the test for determining whether an erroneous jury charge caused egregious harm. We will reverse.
I
A
The Trial Court
According to the State’s testimony, Houston police officers stopped a vehicle, in which appellant was a front-seat passenger,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,304 opinions
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Druery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
1,299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.