Legal Opinion

Hutch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1996No. 1231-94PublishedCited by 1,304 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of possession of cocaine and the trial judge assessed punishment at forty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Hutch v. State, 881 S.W.2d 92 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1994). We granted review to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly applied the test for determining whether an erroneous jury charge caused egregious harm. We will reverse.

I

A

The Trial Court

According to the State’s testimony, Houston police officers stopped a vehicle, in which appellant was a front-seat passenger,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,304 opinions

  1. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Druery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

1,299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API