Craft v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez
{1 We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1 to answer questions of state law certified to this court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding the applicability of the "notice-prejudice rule" to claims-made insurance policies.
12 Under the notice-prejfudice rule, an insured who gives late notice of a claim to his or her insurer does not lose coverage benefits unless the insurer proves by. a preponderance of the evidence that the late notice prejudiced its interests. Friedland v. Travelers Indem. Co., 105 P.3d 689, 643 (Colo.2005). We first adopted the rule…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Hoang v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- A-18-14 Templo Fuente De Vida Corp v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of PittsburghSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- 656 Logan St. Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Owners Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Allen v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Stresscon Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. CsaszarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.