Legal Opinion
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Csaszar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2018No. 17-1075PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.
Auto-Owners Insurance Company provided automobile insurance to Frank and Nancy Csaszar and their daughter, Jennifer. But when that policy's term came to a close, Auto-Owners informed Mr. and Mrs. Csaszar that, because of their daughter's driving record, it would only renew their policy if it excluded her from coverage. The Csaszars agreed. The policy accordingly included an "excluded-driver" provision that stated the policy "shall provide no coverages" for "claims arising out of [Jennifer Csaszar's] operation or use of any automobile." App. at 205.
While this new policy…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Savant Homes, Inc. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dominguez v. Amerisure Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Elmore v. Artisan and Truckers Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Hooper v. Yampa Valley Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Stone Creek Business Center, LLLP v. Stone Creek-Colorado, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Sweet v. Corporation of the PresidingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020