Legal Opinion
Antonietti v. Pearson
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 18, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
Two plaintiffs joined by virtue of section 209, Civil Practice Act, sued defendant, The case was tried and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff as to Adele Antonietti and in a verdict for defendant as to Harry Antonietti. The defendant has taxed a bill of costs against Harry Antonietti and the question is presented as to whether he is entitled to it.
In Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corporation (127 Misc. 543) it was held that a joinder of plaintiffs, under section 209 of the Civil Practice Act, did not lose to either plaintiff or defendants the rights or privileges which each would have had if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Merten v. Queen Rental Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Miranda v. WitteNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Akely v. KinnicuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fields v. Napa Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fourchier v. McNeil Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Leo v. Reile, New York County Courts1959