Legal Opinion
Dilworth v. Yellow Taxi Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 30, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellants, and motion granted,
*544Five plaintiffs are joined in one action. The summons provides for separate judgment for each plaintiff. The complaint separately states the injuries to each of the plaintiffs and specifically alleges the damage which each one of the plaintiffs sustained and demands a separate and distinct judgment.
Notwithstanding the fact that the aggregate of all the amounts claimed by the various plaintiffs is in excess of $1,000, exclusive of interest and costs, the court, nevertheless, has jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Goldey v. BiermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Akely v. KinnicuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Forbes v. City of JamestownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Peacock v. Tata Sons, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dobrikin v. Union Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927
- Hull v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Fourchier v. McNeil Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Antonietti v. PearsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Murtagh v. Keystone Transportation Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.