M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
This is an application for security for costs in an action where there are eighteen non-resident plaintiffs. The courts below have required eighteen bonds to be given and have stayed the action until all were furnished. Akely v. Kinnicutt (208 App. Div. 491) is the authority for this ruling, although the court below was not unanimous. The Appellate Division granted leave to appeal, certifying the following questions:
“ 1. Is it sufficient for the plaintiffs herein to give one undertaking in the sum of $250 or to deposit $250 to secure costs which may be awarded against any or all of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Akely v. KinnicuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Hinman v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Knowlton v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fourchier v. McNeil Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Chiba v. Paul Kurutz & The City Ice & Fuel CoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Boldin v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Brown v. CohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- McCarthy v. AnableNew York Supreme Court · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.