Legal Opinion

Akely v. Kinnicutt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

Defendants appeal from an order denying the defendants’ motion which requested a direction that all non-resident plaintiffs in this action be required to give security for costs. Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act is the provision governing security for costs by non-resident plaintiffs. It reads:

“ § 1522. * * * The defendant in an action brought in a court of record may require security for costs to be given:
“ A. Where the plaintiff, when the action was commenced, either was
“ 1. A person residing without the State; * * A limitation is put upon the foregoing provision in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Kundolf v. . ThalheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Woodruff v. DickieNew York Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Hull v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fourchier v. McNeil Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Antonietti v. PearsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  5. Brown v. KinnicuttDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API