Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Witte

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The plaintiffs herein, under the provisions of section 209 of the Civil Practice Act, joined themselves as coplaintiffs in the above-entitled action (which is one sounded in negligence) against the defendant. A trial was had in the County Court of Erie county, which resulted in the jury rendering a verdict of no cause of action in favor of the defendant and against both plaintiffs, and the defendant thereupon entered a cost judgment against the plaintiffs in the sum of $66.93. Thereafter the plaintiffs took an appeal to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court, Fourth Department, and on such…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hull v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Antonietti v. PearsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. Curry v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. O'Hara v. DerschugNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Boswell v. GreenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API