Legal Opinion

Class v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

Error proceedings were instituted in this court seeking a reversal of the judgment of the Common Pleas Court, which, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, directed a verdict for the defendant.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff, William A. Class, was a delivery man for a laundry company which did business with the Young Women’s Christian -Association. He was required in the course of his work to go to the building of the Young Women’s Christian Association twice a day to collect laundry from and deliver laundry to various floors.

The only facilities for getting from floor to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Springer v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cusumano v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Haag v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  5. Boerner v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API