Legal Opinion

Trigueiro v. Skow

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1937No. Civ. 10523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL, J., pro iem.

The respondent Francis Trigueiro sued, through his guardian ad litem, for injuries inflicted by a motor truck driven by the appellant Stanley Skow and owned by the other appellants. Josephine Trigueiro, his mother, sought special damages for surgical, nurs ing and hospital expenses incurred for her son’s care. A verdict of $5,000 for the son was reduced to $3,000 on motion for new trial. The mother’s verdict was for $898.31.

Francis, a boy of five, was injured while playing with Ernest Caswell, then aged four, outside the Caswell home in El Cerrito. Ernest corroborated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Da Roza v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Tennant v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API